after reading this it confuse me,if thats a true then what tableeghi jamat is doing also bidat ,when someone is born give adhan in new baby ear is also considered as bidat .20 rakat tarveeh ,complete Quran recitation in ramadan,supply food to masji..i can go on and on so many things all considered to be Bidat.
The tableeghi jamat does tableegh or dawah i.e inviting others to Islam and ordering good anf forbidding evil. The holy prophet himself did that and so did the sahaba…that is how islam reached us today…how can you say that it is bidat?! On the other hand it is the reponsibility of every muslim!
Faiq you either didn’t read the article or didn’t understand it !
And you mentioning Tableeghi Jamaat here doesn’t make any sense. Where in the article did the author say that Sunnah is anything the Tableeghi Jamaat does ?
The tableeghi jamat does tableegh or dawah i.e inviting others to Islam and ordering good and forbidding evil. The Holy Prophet(S.A.W) himself did that and so did the sahaba…that is how islam reached us today…how can you say that it is bidat?! On the other hand it is the reponsibility of every muslim!
Aren’t Lailatul Qadr and Shab e Baraat one and the same thing?and wat abt offering nafils on these nights?..biddah?
In the light of your assertion about Bidat, Taraweeh in Ramzan is also Bidat, because our Holy Prophet (SAAWW) never ever said Taraweeh in Ramzan. Recitation of Quran is another thing. Taraweeh was started by Caliph Umar during his rule. Even during the rule of Caliph Abu Bakar no Muslim ever said Taraweeh. So dear Taraweeh is also Bidat. Please don’t say Taraweeh this year when Ramzan is started.
Interesting and informative. But will you write about this more?
People should Fear Allah when they much such stupid statements as calling Taraweeh a Bid’ah
The Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alayhi WaSallam “led his companions in praying for three nights, and on the third or fourth night he did not lead them, and he said: ‘I am afraid that it may be made obligatory upon you.’” This was narrated by al-Bukhaari (872). According to a version narrated by Muslim, “But I was afraid that prayer at night may be made obligatory upon you, and you would not be able to do it.” (1271). So it is proven that Taraaweeh is part of the Sunnah of the Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alayhi WaSallam. The Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alayhi WaSallam referred to the reason why he did not persist in it, which was the fear that it might become obligatory; he did not say that it is not prescribed.
My Dear Abdullah
It is a fact that Holy Prophet’s age was 63 years at the time of leaving this world for good. So in these Precious 63 years Fasting was annouced when he moved from Makkah to Medina. Although he used to say prayer when he was in Makkah. Only once in the history Sahih Bokhari mentions that the Holy Prophet did read Prayer but it was not called Taraweeh, neither in the subsequent years did Holy Prophet try to say prayer like this, nor THE ALMIGHTY ALLAH asked the Holy Prophet to say prayer (like Taraweeh) in the holy month of Ramzan. This is common sense argument. So please don’t get bother we have to follow the teachings of Holy Prophet only if his Sahaba followed the teachings of Holy Prophet in their true spirit then we are made to follow otherwise……….. So dont get emotional when Taraweeh comes to your way.
I gave you the Hadith with reference Mr. Liar ! I am posting it again so read it if you can or else ask someone to do a translation for you to whatever language you understand.
The Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alayhi WaSallam “led his companions in praying for three nights, and on the third or fourth night he did not lead them, and he said: ‘I am afraid that it may be made obligatory upon you.’” This was narrated by al-Bukhaari (872). According to a version narrated by Muslim, “But I was afraid that prayer at night may be made obligatory upon you, and you would not be able to do it.” (1271). So it is proven that Taraaweeh is part of the Sunnah of the Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alayhi WaSallam. The Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alayhi WaSallam referred to the reason why he did not persist in it, which was the fear that it might become obligatory; he did not say that it is not prescribed.
And also according to the belief of AhlusSunnah Wal-Jama’ah, an action of a Sahabi is not called a Bid’ah !
ofcourse this doesn’t mean that I am referring to Taraweeh as an action of the Sahaba but it is a confirmed Sunnah as proven from the Ahadith above.
Interesting and informative
AoA Abdullah,
With due respect, Hazrat Umer is on record in one of the Sahihs ( I am sorry I donot recall the name, but you can find it in Salath sections of the Sahihs) where he mentioned ‘What a beautiful bidah’ or the words to that effect ( again you can read them in the Sahih) after seeing a congregation of Muslims offering taraweeh prayers.
Read for yourself and decide.
The reference people give for the validity of Bid’ah Hasana is usually Umar Ibn Al-Khattab’s statement on Taraweeh prayers. During his caliphate, Umar (may Allah pleased with him) saw people in the masjid praying Taraweeh separately or in different groups. He united them into one congregation under one Imam and said, “Ni’matu Bid’atu Hadhihi (What a good innovation this is!).” (Al-Bukhari, vol. 3, book 32, no. 228)
On the face of it, it does seem to be confusing a little. The Prophet (peace be upon him) has warned several times that all types of Bid’ah are prohibited, and the great Sahabi Umar says something different?
Firstly, what Umar did was not at all a Bid’ah; on the contrary, he revived a Sunnah. The Prophet (peace be upon him) led Taraweeh prayers for three nights during Ramadan. Each night the congregation increased in number. The fourth night, when many more had gathered, the Prophet (peace be upon him) intentionally did not come out to the masjid to lead the prayers. He explained following morning after Fajr prayer, “O people, by Allah, all praise is due to Him, I was not unaware of your presence last night, but I only feared that the night prayer (Qiyam) would become an obligation upon you, which you would be incapable of fulfilling.” (Al-Bukhari, Muslim and others)
The Prophet (peace be upon him) cited the reason: he feared that it may be made obligatory and then it would be difficult for his Ummah to fulfill it. That was the considerate nature of our Prophet (peace be upon him). However, after his death, this reason ceased to exist, as no more revelation would come down, the religion was complete and nothing else could be made obligatory or otherwise. So what Umar did was not an innovation, but a revival of the Sunnah.
Secondly, scholars have explained that Umar did not mean the Bid’ah in Shariah terminology; he was only saying it in a literal sense. Remember that the word Bid’ah doesn’t necessarily mean the Bid’ah in religion. It’s an Arabic word, it can be used in different contexts, and Arabs do use it in different contexts, and that’s how all languages are. So, Umar’s reference is purely linguistic, meaning something new, but not ‘innovation in religion.’ (Refer to “A clarification of doubts regarding innovation” by Sheikh Saleh Al-Fowzan, extracted from his book Kitab Al-Tawheed)
In conclusion, it is best to present some of the statements of our pious predecessors regarding Bid’ah, which makes the issue crystal clear:
u Al-Irbad Bin Saireyah narrated that the Prophet (peace be upon him) said, “I advise you to hear and obey, even if an African slave rules over you, and indeed whomsoever from you lives will see many differences, so hold firmly to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly-guided caliphs after me; hold on to it with your molar teeth and beware of newly invented matters (in the religion). Verily every newly invented matter is an innovation and every innovation is misguidance and every misguidance is destined for the Fire.” (Sahih – Abu Dawood no. 4607, Al-Tirmidhi no. 2676, Ibn Majah no. 43-44, Ahmad 4/126)
u Abdullah Bin Mas’ood said: “Follow and do not innovate, for you have been given what is sufficient and every innovation is misguidance.” (Reported by Abu Khaithamah in Kitabul- ‘llm, Sahih)
u Abdullah Bin Umar said: “Every innovation is misguidance even if people regard it to be something good.” (Reported by Ad-Daarimee with an authentic transmission)
u Imam Sufyan Ath-Thawri said, “Innovation is more beloved to Iblees than sin, since a person makes repentance of sin but does not repent from innovations (because he thinks Bid’ah is from the religion).” (Al-Laalikaa’ee in As-Sunnah, no.238)
u Imam Malik said: “He who innovates something in Islam regarding it as something good has claimed that Muhammad has failed to deliver the Message which he was entrusted to do as Allah says:
Today I have Perfected your Deen for you. (Qur’an, 5:3)
Whatever was not Deen at the time of the Prophet cannot be considered to be a part of the Deen today.” (Reported by Ash-Shaatibee in AI-l’tisaam)
I will also request the admin to stop approving messages that are Excessively Stupid or promote lies against the Prophet and his companions. Or if you approve them, respond to them with proper evidences.
May u live looong
nice info….
July 31, 2009 at 7:54 pm
1. What about istikhara?
2. What about definition of Riba?
(By going through the nine Quranic verses (2:275-280, 3:130, 4:161, 30:39) about riba, one sees that they prohibit riba in very strong language, but do not “define” it.
3. What about the (previous?) ban for women on driving in Saudi Arabia? (of course even under purdah)
4. What about head-to-toe burqa?
Are these bidaahs, religious conjectures, or definite ordainments by Allah?
August 2, 2009 at 2:32 pm
1. The Dua of Istekhara is Masnoon and was taught by Rasool Allah (s). It is simply a dua to seek Allah’s help in making decisions.
However asking others to do istekhara for us or going to istekhara centres or calling up TV to ask them for help in making a decision is NOT ISTEKHARA and such things are therefore biddahs.
2. Definiton of riba is not an act of good deed – so how can it be biddah.
3. driving is not an act of worship or a good deed so how can it be biddah.
If you are asking a verdict whether women driving alone is according to Islam or not then that is another thing..
4. Hijab is ordained by Allah! it is obligatory. There is no question of it being Masnoon or Bidah.
August 7, 2009 at 12:13 am
Please don’t talk about Istikhara as bidat because Istikhara is to seek Almighty Allah’s help as if we are going to start any work and we don’t know whether the outcome of that particular work will be beneficial or fruitful for us, in this way we seek Almighty’s help. Usually when marriage is going to get settled the bride’s or groom’s parents consult some Aalim for Istikhara. So don’t term Istikhara as Bidat. If some miscreant is doing wrong deeds by doing Istikhara that doesn’t mean Istikhara is BIDAT. Similarly marriage is a bonding which is allowed by Almighty Allah, in the film industry it has been observed that a couple is married today, but tomorrow or one week or one month later that couple got separated (means Talaq is done) that doesn’t mean marriage is a bad thing.